Debates

We all figure that President Obama has the personality and planned attributions toward the election. Though Obama is pointed forward to repositioning Romney's strengths foreshadowing business and economy knowledge, maybe too much compassion toward his Obama Care can alter resources outside of such planned alterations. Human communication about college graduates, post graduates and some undergraduate students. If it's about not repeating history, why not take it from an actual graduate, who has been around a political active family. Who can share thoughts from their colleagues of the public to the public.
Obama is about profit meaning the money has to come from elsewhere, defending seniority with Obama care, and with traditional health care, it is possible to fall, and seniors may get stuck which can be a huge topic. Agreeing that bankers should needingly be more knowledgeable, and that market places should keep-sake regulations. But too much recite and regulation may be occurring already with Wall Street.

Romney's emphasizing in what I have viewed, shows he would rather come stronger off of ones strengths than spending time and money focusing on ones weakness. I doubt that this stands for the seniors being able to get more or less of health care, and coming for Obama as in what he accomplished or not in the past 4 years, but to get more reliability on persons who can show of what hasn't happened previously.

Romney stated in recent speech that it's about plans, but what about the "everything doesn't go as planned". Though people make their own choices, it is always going to be about competition.
Bankers should have more knowledge about banking, referring to Qualified Mortgages (DoddFrank) which is still unanticipated according to Romney.

"There could not be a free market if no regulation, yet regulation can become out of date, and excessive hurting the economy in most aspects".

Although the 1st Amendment states: right to freedom of speech, press, assembly and religion, whos really the greatest character out of paid advertisements. Then if we really think of it, isn't it in our hands to decide what we do dealing with voting, schooling and working. We must input our knowledge while doing all three when that time comes along.


I think if all worked as planned, could it be possible to be bribed, noting the 5th amendment and that the rights not listed in constitution is really up to states. Truth is beyond what is being told.
Obama talked about cutting fraud, but how is that possible with needing credit. What about disabled people, it's not just about seniority with healthcare?

According to the recent debate in Denver, they both agree on what could be more of medicare. And bankers should become knowledge capable. Romney seems to care about the torturing costs of Obama Care, the expensive things can hurt families, having Obama Care letting people know of the treatments "they can have" and that worrying of Obama Care did not save jobs. Yet Obama agrees that the questions that were answered this night, was conversations that were brought up 4 years ago. Obama agreed with the irony from Romney and how he worked with democrats in Massachusetts can make a positive difference on many aspects, depending on who you are.

We are all capable of equal protection as citizens, the candidates make it sound smart, yet it's still about keeping it real with your own self knowing consequences, or do we really know them?